The error reported in the previous post can be found in the types of floor and roof that have not set any layer as a variable.
This leads me to think what the real function which was introduced this new type of modeling, that is only to create the screed slope.
fact, when a layer is set to variable, changes in share of the points involved in keeping with the definition of type of floor or roof, while respecting the non-variable thickness of each layer.
However, when you make a change to child elements of an object whose type does not require layers of variable thickness, you get the error mentioned in previous post (also in 2011).
The real mistake, in my view, is to allow editing of items for those types that do not involve layers of variable thickness.
Another annoyance concerns the loss of capacity to accommodate the rails when working as a host on the secondary elements.
This limitation is probably due solely to the railings that remain to develop a set of stairs.
One thing I've always wondered about the railings is the key pillars of the preview tab does not work ... it takes? have the length of the plot ... if you want to see how he is on the scale generated by the check of balustrade to kick you can do (just set that as a preview of the materials for rendering where you can choose what kind of object to apply the material) ... but if I'm building a railing for a specific scale, together with the selection of the object type of preview, I will have an option "Select object in the model, I put in half-tones all items that are not from host, selezionerò la mia scala specifica e tornerò alla scheda di editazione delle ringhiere.
Non sto chiedendo di migliorare le ringhiere dal punto di vista della modellazione, si dovrà fare, ma con pazienza si può ottenere davvero molto con gli strumenti di cui si dispone ora.
Il massimo sarebbe poterle gestire con dei template come le facciate continue...chissà coi componenti adattivi....Staremo a vedere!
0 comments:
Post a Comment