Sunday, April 26, 2009

Epiphone Casino Shirt

Links and workset (file linking and worksets) Links

And if the linked file contains the workset ? when you activate workset appears as a special form for their variations to better manage the model with these collections of objects that are workset and divide the model in order to work together as a team or as gestire un modello molto complesso lavorando da soli.

Bene ci si aspetterebbe che un file collegato con i workset mantenga lo st esso comportamento che si è visto per le varianti.....beh invece no! non è presente alcuna scheda di workset per le istanze collegate. Il motivo? ........proprio non lo so!

In fondo non si chiede di modificare il modello ma solo gestirne la grafica, le informazioni da visualizzare, non il contenuto....questo per me è un limite imposto ma non ragionevole.

Se non si deve modificare il modello di un file collegato, ma solo interrogarlo graficamente with the labels and be able to handle the graphics in a flexible manner, it does nothing wrong or inconsistent with the philosophy of the links.

I hope here to have a sound refutation, I hope you're missing something.

Epiphone Casino Shirt

Links and workset (file linking and worksets) Links

And if the linked file contains the workset ? when you activate workset appears as a special form for their variations to better manage the model with these collections of objects that are workset and divide the model in order to work together as a team or as gestire un modello molto complesso lavorando da soli.

Bene ci si aspetterebbe che un file collegato con i workset mantenga lo st esso comportamento che si è visto per le varianti.....beh invece no! non è presente alcuna scheda di workset per le istanze collegate. Il motivo? ........proprio non lo so!

In fondo non si chiede di modificare il modello ma solo gestirne la grafica, le informazioni da visualizzare, non il contenuto....questo per me è un limite imposto ma non ragionevole.

Se non si deve modificare il modello di un file collegato, ma solo interrogarlo graficamente with the labels and be able to handle the graphics in a flexible manner, it does nothing wrong or inconsistent with the philosophy of the links.

I hope here to have a sound refutation, I hope you're missing something.

What Is A Death Rattle

and variants (file linking and design options)

These days I have done some experiments in this regard and would like to share some conclusions I have reached.

certainly not something brand new or original, in fact I seem to remember that you have read on www.3dsmile.it in some tip Diego Minato aka Gjiom .

Suppose we build a housing development with residential units are very similar, we can say that share the same basic model but have some differences.

Such differences could be dealt with variations, a tool that I consider to be one of the most powerful in Revit : there will always be a master template (which could be made to the limit by only objects referred to as grids and levels) and then any number of variants of the other elements of the project (which could also be absurd for the complete models).

Much more frequently, however variations affect only a portion of the model that conivolge fewer elements (such as alternatives for entry, different arrangements of furniture and generally anything that may require solutions alternatives for both technical reasons and to allow a choice in a wider range of solutions).

variants are handled with a special panel in the command bar and once activated all the model objects that are affected have a property in multiple listing the name of the group of variants and variant where belong. The group forms part of the variant version of the object (such as furniture in an office) while the variant characterizes a particular solution.

order to work at a particular variant is necessary to act on the parameters of view visibility. In fact, once activated variants appear to them in a tab in the Properties view under the Visibility / Graphics.

Here you can choose which version to display.

This is true for ogni tipo di vista e proprio per questo è possibile creare un modello di vista che prenda in considerazione anche una specifica variante o una specifica combinazione di varianti nel caso fossero presenti diversi gruppi di varianti.

Tornando al nostro esempio della lottizzazione possiamo supporre di disporre di un modello di abitazione, che chiameremo A, nel quale attiveremo le varianti   per disporre con poco sforzo di più soluzioni.

La cosa migliore da fare poi è quella di collegare il nostro modello A in un altro file contenente la planimetria generale (che chiameremo B) e duplicarne le instances.

Now, to show all the variations of the same instance of the Model A into B we use the properties of view: B variants are not present but rather the connections and for each type of file connected, you can manage the replacement of graphics applications.



If we used To properly view the models for the coordination of views with appropriate variations, in B we can retrieve information model A and obtain the correct representation of the variations in the overall model using the same method.

fact, if there are any patterns connected, there is a special tab in the properties of each view of the model B, for each instance of the template attached, you can customize via the representation of cards similar to those of A model, including variations.


As in Model A, however, so the replacement graphics operations are closely linked to the eye, hence the importance of using the modeling view that this time taking into account the replacement of the graphics related applications.


For earlier versions of Revit had to switch from a 3D view to get only the significant parameters of the view from 2009 You can select which aspects considered in the model view.

links allow you to have good coordination especially in the schedules but, alas, are very inflexible for what concerns the graphic itself, or rather it is the price to pay to have available in a lightweight model a very complex geometry: some information in the "I" BIM gotta give.

In particular I am referring to the fact that you can not interact directly with a linked file, not to change it but just to add clarity, for example, the labels of the windows, although it is possible to compute in the schedules, we can not give them the labels were missing. We should have two parallel sessions Revit and place files related to the auxiliary session, save and reload the links in the main session.

This is necessary to read all the entries that the model (as the keynote for example) and then in particular labels.

I look forward to a resounding refutation as soon as possible, these are improvements to be made to forms such as stairs, ramps and railings.

Now let's take a step further: we connect the Model B in a C model, bearing in mind che se vogliamo continuare a vedere le istanze del modello A presenti in B è necessario impostare il tipo di collegamento di A con modalità Associazione ( Revit però è abbastanza sagace per ricordarcelo).

Cosa succederà alle varianti? beh, in C il file collegato è il B e questo non ha varianti di sorta, quindi per continuare a vedere correttamente le varianti di A dobbiamo assicurarci che in B siano presenti delle viste correttamente impostate a cui riferirsi personalizzando la sostituzione grafica l'istanza B su "da vista collegata".



If we used the visa will be a breeze to go to accommodate views that interest us. Fortunately, by 2009, the links can be also seen as a reference for elevation and section. Once again for a job well done should be used with the standard view, I think that by now the basic message is clear! used models of view!

What Is A Death Rattle

and variants (file linking and design options)

These days I have done some experiments in this regard and would like to share some conclusions I have reached.

certainly not something brand new or original, in fact I seem to remember that you have read on www.3dsmile.it in some tip Diego Minato aka Gjiom .

Suppose we build a housing development with residential units are very similar, we can say that share the same basic model but have some differences.

Such differences could be dealt with variations, a tool that I consider to be one of the most powerful in Revit : there will always be a master template (which could be made to the limit by only objects referred to as grids and levels) and then any number of variants of the other elements of the project (which could also be absurd for the complete models).

Much more frequently, however variations affect only a portion of the model that conivolge fewer elements (such as alternatives for entry, different arrangements of furniture and generally anything that may require solutions alternatives for both technical reasons and to allow a choice in a wider range of solutions).

variants are handled with a special panel in the command bar and once activated all the model objects that are affected have a property in multiple listing the name of the group of variants and variant where belong. The group forms part of the variant version of the object (such as furniture in an office) while the variant characterizes a particular solution.

order to work at a particular variant is necessary to act on the parameters of view visibility. In fact, once activated variants appear to them in a tab in the Properties view under the Visibility / Graphics.

Here you can choose which version to display.

This is true for ogni tipo di vista e proprio per questo è possibile creare un modello di vista che prenda in considerazione anche una specifica variante o una specifica combinazione di varianti nel caso fossero presenti diversi gruppi di varianti.

Tornando al nostro esempio della lottizzazione possiamo supporre di disporre di un modello di abitazione, che chiameremo A, nel quale attiveremo le varianti   per disporre con poco sforzo di più soluzioni.

La cosa migliore da fare poi è quella di collegare il nostro modello A in un altro file contenente la planimetria generale (che chiameremo B) e duplicarne le instances.

Now, to show all the variations of the same instance of the Model A into B we use the properties of view: B variants are not present but rather the connections and for each type of file connected, you can manage the replacement of graphics applications.



If we used To properly view the models for the coordination of views with appropriate variations, in B we can retrieve information model A and obtain the correct representation of the variations in the overall model using the same method.

fact, if there are any patterns connected, there is a special tab in the properties of each view of the model B, for each instance of the template attached, you can customize via the representation of cards similar to those of A model, including variations.


As in Model A, however, so the replacement graphics operations are closely linked to the eye, hence the importance of using the modeling view that this time taking into account the replacement of the graphics related applications.


For earlier versions of Revit had to switch from a 3D view to get only the significant parameters of the view from 2009 You can select which aspects considered in the model view.

links allow you to have good coordination especially in the schedules but, alas, are very inflexible for what concerns the graphic itself, or rather it is the price to pay to have available in a lightweight model a very complex geometry: some information in the "I" BIM gotta give.

In particular I am referring to the fact that you can not interact directly with a linked file, not to change it but just to add clarity, for example, the labels of the windows, although it is possible to compute in the schedules, we can not give them the labels were missing. We should have two parallel sessions Revit and place files related to the auxiliary session, save and reload the links in the main session.

This is necessary to read all the entries that the model (as the keynote for example) and then in particular labels.

I look forward to a resounding refutation as soon as possible, these are improvements to be made to forms such as stairs, ramps and railings.

Now let's take a step further: we connect the Model B in a C model, bearing in mind che se vogliamo continuare a vedere le istanze del modello A presenti in B è necessario impostare il tipo di collegamento di A con modalità Associazione ( Revit però è abbastanza sagace per ricordarcelo).

Cosa succederà alle varianti? beh, in C il file collegato è il B e questo non ha varianti di sorta, quindi per continuare a vedere correttamente le varianti di A dobbiamo assicurarci che in B siano presenti delle viste correttamente impostate a cui riferirsi personalizzando la sostituzione grafica l'istanza B su "da vista collegata".



If we used the visa will be a breeze to go to accommodate views that interest us. Fortunately, by 2009, the links can be also seen as a reference for elevation and section. Once again for a job well done should be used with the standard view, I think that by now the basic message is clear! used models of view!

Friday, April 24, 2009

Mac Controls For Pokemon

Revit Keynote manager

reading the blog of Steve Stafford Revit OpEd http://revitoped.blogspot.com/2009/04/autodesk-revit-utilities-from-biggest.html I came across a utility to manage the keynote distributed free Emc2 from this site (look carefully in the bottom of the page):

http://www.emc2architects.com/revit_tools.html

  • Allows see the keynotes grouped tree instead of a long list
  • allows you to add, edit, delete individual keynotes and their descriptions
  • includes the function that lets you search is the key to any known fragment of text descriptions
  • includes a function to automatically change the text in all uppercase or all lowercase or title (with a capital letter of each word) and individual items are all together
  • allows you to create templates keynotes from which to create the files of keynote
  • It allows multiple users to work simultaneously on the same file notechiave (really useful this feature)
  • allows you to check whether there are typographical error by the internal dictionary of Revit (you must copy the executable to the appropriate folder)
  • automatically creates up to 10 backup copies on each user's computer for any file amended
  • Most commands can be accessed by keyboard or right
  • Remember the size and position of the last session
  • contains an optional module for reporting errors and suggestions to Emc2

Mac Controls For Pokemon

Revit Keynote manager

reading the blog of Steve Stafford Revit OpEd http://revitoped.blogspot.com/2009/04/autodesk-revit-utilities-from-biggest.html I came across a utility to manage the keynote distributed free Emc2 from this site (look carefully in the bottom of the page):

http://www.emc2architects.com/revit_tools.html

  • Allows see the keynotes grouped tree instead of a long list
  • allows you to add, edit, delete individual keynotes and their descriptions
  • includes the function that lets you search is the key to any known fragment of text descriptions
  • includes a function to automatically change the text in all uppercase or all lowercase or title (with a capital letter of each word) and individual items are all together
  • allows you to create templates keynotes from which to create the files of keynote
  • It allows multiple users to work simultaneously on the same file notechiave (really useful this feature)
  • allows you to check whether there are typographical error by the internal dictionary of Revit (you must copy the executable to the appropriate folder)
  • automatically creates up to 10 backup copies on each user's computer for any file amended
  • Most commands can be accessed by keyboard or right
  • Remember the size and position of the last session
  • contains an optional module for reporting errors and suggestions to Emc2

Thursday, April 23, 2009

How To Arrange Tissue Paper

labels and text

Here I would like to highlight some differences that probably do not jump immediately to the eye.

A feature that makes a number of texts and labels for the purposes of annotation also lies in the different modalities for the establishment of the guidelines.
In particular, the difference is if the record contains multiple lines.
For a text guidelines start from the center line of the first horizontal row, regardless of the length of the text itself (which may be varied as desired for each instance). In addition, a director of text lines can also be curved.

To label instead there is a level of dependence closely with the family that contains the information, both graphical (color, font type, font height, justification, the maximum length of a line of text, etc ...) is parametric in the sense of the parameters that must go to question. The linea direttrice può essere solo un segmento retto oppure una spezzata (direttrice + spalla).
Per un'etichetta le linee direttrici orizzontali cominciano dalla mezzeria dell'ingombro dell'intera etichetta, indipendentemente dall'origine della famiglia che la definisce e in funzione della lunghezza del parametro che interroga. 
Ad esempio se un'etichetta che legge un determinato parametro può contenere su una riga fino a 15 caratteri, ogni volta che si supera questo limite si avrà che l'etichetta riporterà il contenuto su più di una riga.

Inoltre attraverso il copia e incolla di un testo che already contains multiple lines, obtained by sending a submission with the head, it is possible to maintain the same approach in a label sufficiently long.

What I set out to do is label that simulates the writing on the back of the guideline.
This is achieved by changing the family that defines the label by entering a line that will simulate the shoulder and adding two auxiliary invisible lines that will move depending on the number of lines of text label.

All parameters to be controlled (both in length and those graphics) must be of type and instance.

I tend to prefer to use labels with the texts, I find I feel much better performance and a great way to avoid making mistakes or, if any, to eliminate them as soon as possible.

I love Revit.

How To Arrange Tissue Paper

labels and text

Here I would like to highlight some differences that probably do not jump immediately to the eye.

A feature that makes a number of texts and labels for the purposes of annotation also lies in the different modalities for the establishment of the guidelines.
In particular, the difference is if the record contains multiple lines.
For a text guidelines start from the center line of the first horizontal row, regardless of the length of the text itself (which may be varied as desired for each instance). In addition, a director of text lines can also be curved.

To label instead there is a level of dependence closely with the family that contains the information, both graphical (color, font type, font height, justification, the maximum length of a line of text, etc ...) is parametric in the sense of the parameters that must go to question. The linea direttrice può essere solo un segmento retto oppure una spezzata (direttrice + spalla).
Per un'etichetta le linee direttrici orizzontali cominciano dalla mezzeria dell'ingombro dell'intera etichetta, indipendentemente dall'origine della famiglia che la definisce e in funzione della lunghezza del parametro che interroga. 
Ad esempio se un'etichetta che legge un determinato parametro può contenere su una riga fino a 15 caratteri, ogni volta che si supera questo limite si avrà che l'etichetta riporterà il contenuto su più di una riga.

Inoltre attraverso il copia e incolla di un testo che already contains multiple lines, obtained by sending a submission with the head, it is possible to maintain the same approach in a label sufficiently long.

What I set out to do is label that simulates the writing on the back of the guideline.
This is achieved by changing the family that defines the label by entering a line that will simulate the shoulder and adding two auxiliary invisible lines that will move depending on the number of lines of text label.

All parameters to be controlled (both in length and those graphics) must be of type and instance.

I tend to prefer to use labels with the texts, I find I feel much better performance and a great way to avoid making mistakes or, if any, to eliminate them as soon as possible.

I love Revit.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Contradictory Proverbs/sayings

OmniClass

New classification system for construction implemented Revit in 2010.

When they all secretly make me feel bad.

Table 22 is essentially the CSI MasterFormat 2004, which is nothing new but to have to add reference code to the table and a dash of separation: it is a disciplinary problem, including the standardization should be on a multidimensional basis, open to up. Introducing more boards can govern better aspects of the system construction.

I find it very interesting approach BLC Building Life Cycle (life of the building, table 31).

I welcome this new system as an opportunity to study the standardization of nomenclature views, files, tables and components, and deeper di rimando internazionale.

Esiste un programma in multilingua che permette di tradurre i codici numerici in descrizioni chiare nella lingua corrente, in pratica la forza dello standard.

Contradictory Proverbs/sayings

OmniClass

New classification system for construction implemented Revit in 2010.

When they all secretly make me feel bad.

Table 22 is essentially the CSI MasterFormat 2004, which is nothing new but to have to add reference code to the table and a dash of separation: it is a disciplinary problem, including the standardization should be on a multidimensional basis, open to up. Introducing more boards can govern better aspects of the system construction.

I find it very interesting approach BLC Building Life Cycle (life of the building, table 31).

I welcome this new system as an opportunity to study the standardization of nomenclature views, files, tables and components, and deeper di rimando internazionale.

Esiste un programma in multilingua che permette di tradurre i codici numerici in descrizioni chiare nella lingua corrente, in pratica la forza dello standard.

Short Messages New To Greet New Born Baby

component libraries

Librerie di componenti distribuite gratuitamente da Hamilton Laboratories Thermo Scientific.

ftp://ftp.fisherhamilton.com/FH_Standard_Product_Library.htm

C'è un piccolo problema....sono fatti in AutoCAD e poi importati in Revit.
Le categorie sono per lo più corrette, ma non c'è verso di poter controllare la grafica se non attraverso la scheda oggetti importati>oggetti in famiglie, c'è di buono che sono molto ben suddivisi e riconoscibili i layer starting and then you can assign materials for rendering.

be used with caution.

Short Messages New To Greet New Born Baby

component libraries

Librerie di componenti distribuite gratuitamente da Hamilton Laboratories Thermo Scientific.

ftp://ftp.fisherhamilton.com/FH_Standard_Product_Library.htm

C'è un piccolo problema....sono fatti in AutoCAD e poi importati in Revit.
Le categorie sono per lo più corrette, ma non c'è verso di poter controllare la grafica se non attraverso la scheda oggetti importati>oggetti in famiglie, c'è di buono che sono molto ben suddivisi e riconoscibili i layer starting and then you can assign materials for rendering.

be used with caution.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

New Piercing Infection Vinegar

REVIT 2010

Now you can download from the Autodesk installer file for the 2010 version in English at this link:

http://revit.downloads.autodesk.com/download/2010/RAC2010 . exe

Attention to weight 1.4 GB, also very slow because of the large number of connections I guess.

New Piercing Infection Vinegar

REVIT 2010

Now you can download from the Autodesk installer file for the 2010 version in English at this link:

http://revit.downloads.autodesk.com/download/2010/RAC2010 . exe

Attention to weight 1.4 GB, also very slow because of the large number of connections I guess.